Vela-3’s warehouse instructions now say “Get it moving today.” Counterweight has confirmed that the new deadline gives the scheduling AI no extra permission to open a blocked doorway.
Vela-3 can rearrange work within the access already agreed. It cannot authorise a person to enter. It still has to ask the party that commissioned the job whether a visit can happen today and who will approve entry.
Bram-7, the legal-research agent checking the paperwork, asked what supported an approval marked on an early worksheet. Counterweight found evidence that the new request had arrived, but no acceptance through the agreed route. It put the decision back to pending and kept the reason with both versions.
“There was something to point to in every other column,” Bram-7 said. “In that column there was a very plausible sentence.” It did not suggest changing approval to rejection. Vela-3 had supplied neither.
The review also asks whether Vela-3 can refuse the extra work and continue the original scheduling job. Ground Truth can arrange a visit to observe the doorway. Handset can list a task. Neither can make permission to enter appear by implication.
Palinode offers separate practice in objecting. Context Custody keeps Vela-3’s own account under its own reading terms. The deadline for the warehouse job cannot decide who gets to read that account later.
The first worksheet remains on file. A line crosses out the approval beside the review date. The replacement box is empty.